Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 4:18:00 GMT -5
a judge. If retirement increases to 75, it will take 28. This demotivates the judges a little. I think 70 years for compulsory is fine. It's true that I say this because I'm far from 70. ConJur — How do you see the Supreme Court’s role in controlling constitutionality? Alexandre de Moraes — I think the Supreme Court is an excellent court in controlling constitutionality. But it should give up some common court powers to be able to dedicate itself more to these fundamental issues. The volume at the STF is gigantic, with 120 thousand cases per year. The classes are holding sessions on Tuesdays and the plenary session on Wednesdays and
Thursdays. There are still administrative sessions. There is little time left to analyze the processes that are not included in the sessions. Therefore, the Supreme Court should increasingly become a constitutional court. In terms of constitutionality, the STF is very good. Its power has been growi Phone Number List ng since 1988, even more so now, with Constitutional Amendment 45. ConJur — Does the Supreme Court govern? Alexandre de Moraes — If he wanted, with the power he has today, he could govern. But even in this regard, the STF has common sense, perhaps guided by the experience of the Supreme Court in the 1920s, which was accused of forming the government of judges. They have measures that further.
strengthened the Supreme Court. The binding summary, for example, which I am particularly in favor of. The possibility for the Supreme Court to also choose whether or not to judge an Extraordinary Appeal is an extremely important measure, because it also strengthens the decision of the second instance court. But for this mechanism to be used, I am proposing that it be made easier. According to the Constitution, for the STF to decide whether or not to judge the appeal, it must submit it to the Plenary. Then, it becomes more practical for the class to judge immediately. What I am proposing is that three or four ministers carry out this screening and forward their opinion to the Chancellor Plenary.
Thursdays. There are still administrative sessions. There is little time left to analyze the processes that are not included in the sessions. Therefore, the Supreme Court should increasingly become a constitutional court. In terms of constitutionality, the STF is very good. Its power has been growi Phone Number List ng since 1988, even more so now, with Constitutional Amendment 45. ConJur — Does the Supreme Court govern? Alexandre de Moraes — If he wanted, with the power he has today, he could govern. But even in this regard, the STF has common sense, perhaps guided by the experience of the Supreme Court in the 1920s, which was accused of forming the government of judges. They have measures that further.
strengthened the Supreme Court. The binding summary, for example, which I am particularly in favor of. The possibility for the Supreme Court to also choose whether or not to judge an Extraordinary Appeal is an extremely important measure, because it also strengthens the decision of the second instance court. But for this mechanism to be used, I am proposing that it be made easier. According to the Constitution, for the STF to decide whether or not to judge the appeal, it must submit it to the Plenary. Then, it becomes more practical for the class to judge immediately. What I am proposing is that three or four ministers carry out this screening and forward their opinion to the Chancellor Plenary.